To submit a critique and suggestions click on the e-mail thingy below the photos.
This website is about taxidermy and people that make up the taxidermy industry. Hobbyist, part timers, full timers, manufacturers, suppliers, we're all represented here, and we all have NAMES. Be sure to sign YOUR name to your critique!
First fox mount and first pheasant mount
I know these have room for a lot of improvement but I used a lot of reference on both. I'm just wanting to know exactly what I did wrong so I can improve on those flaws next time.
This is my first fox mount.
Please enter Nina's fox in the subject line of your critique.
This is my first pheasant mount.
Please enter Nina's pheasant in the subject line of your critique.
Nina is off to a pretty promising start and both mounts are pleasing to the eye at first glance, but she seems to have all of the problem areas everybody starts with....
-secondary auricular cartilage
-ears slighty high on head
-pupils should tilt inward slightly, i think the figure cited is 15 degrees, usually.
- transition from artificial nose (it is artificial, right?) to skin is a bit obvious.
-too much skin showing at the lip line
-muzzle contour looks wrong on the mannikin itself... and the shape of the parietal region on the skull seems much too wide for a grey...
I'd suggest keeping some skulls and death masks around or acquiring them... i'm in the process of doing this now as i'm starting to see what people are talking about when they say certain mannikins are not correct.
frankly i can't stand birds! for some reason they are always a mess for me! I think the tail and neck angles might be off, but as always, check reference. Does your bird have a tongue? I can't see it.